International Financial Reporting
Standards, IFRS (IAS)
|
ADOPTION OF IAS[1]
in THE EU by January 2005 and Microsoft Navision W1
Whitepaper
January 2004
Using this document
This document is an overview of
International Accounting Standards (IAS)
and a description of the functionality of the Microsoft Business Solutions-Navision
W1 product that will give the user an idea of where to focus when starting an
IAS compliance process.
The scope of the document is to bring forward some
issues related to preparing financial statements according to IAS. It is not
intended as a complete description of the IAS framework.
Disclaimer
The use of Microsoft Navision described in
this document is intended as examples only and is not intended to describe the
only way to use the functionality of the Microsoft Business Solutions-Navision
W1 product in accordance with IAS.
This
material is for informational purposes only.
Microsoft
Business Solutions ApS disclaims all warranties and conditions with regard to
use of the material for other purposes. Microsoft Business Solutions ApS shall
not, at any time, be liable for any special, direct, indirect or consequential
damages, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other action arising
out of or in connection with the use or performance of the material. Nothing
herein should be construed as constituting any kind of warranty.
The names of
actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their
respective owners.
Copyright
Notice:
Copyright © 2004
Microsoft Business Solutions ApS ,
Denmark . All
rights reserved.
Trademark
Notice:
Microsoft, Great
Plains, Navision, FRx, are either registered trademarks or trademarks of
Microsoft Corporation or Great Plains Software, Inc., FRx Software Corporation,
or Microsoft Business Solutions ApS or their affiliates in the United States
and/or other countries. Great Plains Software, Inc., FRx Software Corporation,
and Microsoft Business Solutions ApS are subsidiaries of Microsoft Corporation.
Content
Summary
Effective January 1, 2005 all listed
companies in the 15 European Union (EU) countries must prepare consolidated
financial statements compliant with International Accounting Standards (from
2003: International Financial Reporting Standards, IFRS).
IAS/IFRS 2005 will impact financial
reporting in relation to recognition and measurement, and in relation to
consolidation and reporting. Depending on the local GAAP currently in use, one
of the major recognition and measurement changes is extended use of fair-value
principles instead of historical cost. Fair-value, net present value concepts
(NPV) are focused on current and expected cash flow streams rather than
historical purchase price (e.g. amortization of goodwill over 30 years, which
will now be evaluated based on discounted cash flows every period). On the
reporting side, segment reporting by business unit and geographical location
will be required.
This compliance statement is intended to
explain the position of Microsoft Navision in relation to IAS compliance for
2005. Within this compliance statement, the IAS standards are compared to Microsoft
Navision W1. Only those IAS where you would expect the ERP system to support
decision making and reporting in regard to the given IAS are considered. IAS 1,
2, 14, 16, 21, 27, 46, 38, 39, and 40 are described in more detail regarding Microsoft
Navision W1. The
description will provide a summary of the given IAS, in general terms, the
relevance for Microsoft Navision W1 and commentary on how Microsoft Navision
users can comply with the given IAS.
Compliance
is defined as the ability to meet the requirements in the IAS standards using Microsoft
Navision W1. That means that, for standards for which Microsoft Navision has
functionality, compliance is met when the functionality in Microsoft Navision
allows the user to prepare a financial statement in accordance with IAS. For
standards for which Microsoft Navision W1 does not have functionality
compliance is implied as long as the standards do not contain requirements that
should be fulfilled by Microsoft Navision W1. This is the reason why several
IAS's can be excluded from deeper analysis.
Complying
with IAS does not necessarily require the ERP system to be able to generate the
final financial statement used for public disclosure (i.e. the annual report).
Availability of information needed to prepare financial statements and the
absence of any misleading information (e.g. incorrect bookkeeping) is
emphasized in this report. It should be emphasized that IAS Compliance for an
ERP system is more than just functionality - it includes both the setup and use
of the system.
Potential
issues regarding add-ons and country localized versions of Microsoft Navision
products are not addressed in full. The sheer number of available add-ons makes
it impossible to make any definite statement regarding these; hence the
comments are only guidelines.
Background
7000 group companies inEurope are now
focusing on the IAS/IFRS standards. The final deadline[2]
is that consolidated financial statements for 2005 must comply with IAS. In
practice, this means that financial data for 2004 must also be converted
because IAS generally requires that comparison data for the previous year be
presented. Additionally, the balance sheet for 31 December 2003 must be
presented in accordance with IAS since it is the starting balance for 2004,
which must be linked with reconciliations to the first IAS balance sheet.
The transition regulations require that the first IAS financial statements must comply with the accounting policies effective when the financial statements for 2005 are prepared. For this reason, IAS-compatible data for 2003 and 2004 cannot be published before the publication date of the 2005 financial statements in 2006.
7000 group companies in
The transition regulations require that the first IAS financial statements must comply with the accounting policies effective when the financial statements for 2005 are prepared. For this reason, IAS-compatible data for 2003 and 2004 cannot be published before the publication date of the 2005 financial statements in 2006.
The objectives[3]
of the reform as defined by the European Council in 2000 are to:
·
Create a high-performance and
liquid European financial market,
·
Facilitate the evaluation of
companies through greater financial transparency.
Adopting IAS in the EU is regarded as
essential to ensuring transparency and comparability of financial statements
and thereby ensuring an efficient capital market in the EU by providing much
more detailed information to the users with emphasis on content and not form.
Definition of compliance &
Comparing Microsoft Navision to the IFRS requirements
Compliance
is defined as the ability to meet the requirements in the IAS standards using Microsoft
Navision W1. That means that when the functionality in Microsoft Navision
allows the user to prepare a financial statement in accordance with a given IAS
standard compliance is assumed and also that for standards for which Microsoft
Navision W1 does not have functionality compliance is implied. This is the
reason why several IAS’s do not need deeper analysis.
Complying
with IAS does not require the ERP system to be able to generate the final
financial statement (i.e. annual report) used for public disclosure.
Availability of information needed to prepare the financial statement and the
absence of any misleading information (e.g. incorrect bookkeeping) is the thing
to emphasize in this compliance report. The compliance overview in this report
only considers non-financial companies.
The challenge for Finance Departments
From a finance department perspective the
workload involved in preparing financial statements complying with IFRS lies
mostly outside the ERP systems. Ensuring that the ERP system will enable them
to deliver timely and accurate financial information could bias customers
towards the ERP system that is labelled as above. The larger ERP system vendors
have already tagged their product with “Complies with International Accounting
Standards”.
Even though it is important to provide ERP
systems with functionality to handle the IAS requirements, it is equally
important that the users understand that how they use their systems and set up
their parameters in line with the reporting requirements is critical.
Looking at the challenges from a finance
department’s viewpoint and depending on the company’s activities some of the
major challenges will be:
·
Leasing agreements (IAS 17)
·
Pensions (IAS 19)
·
Foreign currency (21)
·
Financial Instruments and Hedge
Accounting (IAS 39)
·
Segment reporting (IAS 14)
·
Differences to local GAAP
·
Considerably more extensive
notes to the Financial Statements
The changes will come primarily from:
·
Inclusion of some of the
current off-balance sheet items in the balance sheet, e.g. derivatives
·
More focus on fair (market)
value revaluations of assets and liabilities.
·
Segment reporting, providing
more detailed information on economic and geographic dimensions.
·
New classification for
financial instruments and related accounting rules.
Document Sources
Web sites:
Since the IAS is a legal requirement the
summary part of the IAS’s are copied almost word-by-word from these official
sources.
The IAS Regulation
Application of International Accounting
Standards in EU: Regulation (EC) 1606/2002 of the European Parliament of the
Council of 19.7.2002
IAS Compliance - Overview
This chapter gives an overview of the existing, active IAS'.
Active IAS' as per december 2003[4]
IAS No.
|
Description
|
Revised
|
IAS 1
|
Presentation of Financial
Statements
|
2003
|
IAS 2
|
Inventories
|
2003
|
IAS 7
|
Cash Flow Statements
|
1992
|
IAS 8
|
Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors
|
2003
|
IAS 10
|
Events After the Balance
Sheet Date
|
2003
|
IAS 11
|
Construction Contracts
|
1993
|
IAS 12
|
Income Taxes
|
2000
|
IAS 14
|
Segment Reporting
|
1997
|
IAS 16
|
Property, Plant and
Equipment
|
2003
|
IAS 17
|
Leases
|
2003
|
IAS 18
|
Revenue
|
1993
|
IAS 19
|
Employee Benefits
|
2002
|
IAS 20
|
Accounting for Government
Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance
|
1983
|
IAS 21
|
The Effects of Changes in
Foreign Exchange Rates
|
2003
|
IAS 22
|
Business Combinations
|
1998
|
IAS 23
|
Borrowing Costs
|
1993
|
IAS 24
|
Related Party Disclosures
|
2003
|
IAS 26
|
Accounting and Reporting by
Retirement Benefit Plans
|
1987
|
IAS 27
|
Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
2003
|
IAS 28
|
Investments in Associates
|
2003
|
IAS 29
|
Financial Reporting in
Hyperinflationary Economies
|
1989
|
IAS 30
|
Disclosures in the Financial
Statements of Banks and Similar Financial Institutions
|
1990
|
IAS 31
|
Financial Reporting of
Interests in Joint Ventures
|
2000
|
IAS 32
|
Financial Instruments -
Disclosure and Presentation
|
2003
|
IAS 33
|
Earnings per Share
|
2003
|
IAS 34
|
Interim Financial Reporting
|
1998
|
IAS 35
|
Discontinuing Operations
|
1998
|
IAS 36
|
Impairment of Assets
|
2000
|
IAS 37
|
Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets
|
1998
|
IAS 38
|
Intangible Assets
|
1997
|
IAS 39
|
Financial Instruments -
Recognition and Measurement
|
2003
|
IAS 40
|
Investment Property
|
2003
|
IAS 41
|
Agriculture
|
2001
|
Some of the IAS's are less relevant for Microsoft
Navision than others. However, the IAS's
are still very relevant for the users who prepare financial statements. Indeed,
they have to comply with all IAS's without exception. But from an ERP systems
perspective, the actual compliance with one of the following IAS's is first met
when the user has decided upon the correct classification, categorization or
other such non-quantifiable decisions with which the system cannot assist or
provide input for. Thus IAS compliance is more than just recording the
transactions.
In most cases the reasoning for the lesser
relevance for Microsoft Navision W1 is due to the subject matter; being that of
evaluation, categorizing, or classification of transactions, which Microsoft
Navision cannot assist in, or the fact that Microsoft Navision has no
functionality specifically aimed at that subject matter. In the latter case the
registration of transactions is performed by posting the appropriate General
Journals Lines or using existing functionality in a way that allows the user to
record the transactions in the General Ledger. (E.g. using Fixed assets for
Goodwill or importing transaction data from a third party product into a
General Journal for subsequent posting to the General Ledger.). In some cases
the user will need external data to make those decisions and in other cases the
user will want to import external data into Microsoft Navision. The actual use of the system (in accordance
with accounting legislation and good accounting practice) is not what defines
IAS compliance.
IAS Compliance – Microsoft Navision
W1
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial
Statements
Summary of IAS 1
The objective of IAS 1 is to outline the
basis for presentation of financial statements. It sets out the overall
framework and responsibilities for the presentation of financial statements,
guidelines for their structure and minimum requirements for the content of the
financial statements.
IAS 1 prescribes the minimum detail level
required on the face of the balance sheet and the income statement, and also
defines the overall considerations for financial statements, such as Fair presentation, Accrual basis of
accounting, Consistency of presentation, Materiality and Aggregation, and
Comparative information
IAS defines four basic financial statement elements and prescribes the
minimum structure and content for each:
·
Balance sheet (current/non-current distinction is required)
·
Income statement (operating/non-operating separation is required)
·
Cash flow statement (IAS 7 prescribes the details)
·
Statement of changes in equity.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 1
Microsoft
Navision lets the user define the Chart of Accounts structure. Through the
use of appropriate setup parameters, such as G/L Accounts specified in Posting
Groups, and the use of Advanced Dimension the detail level for each recorded
transaction can be controlled to fit the requirement for analysis and auditing.
The different modules allow more detailed
registration of, say, fixed assets and accounts payable.
The report facilities and data extraction
options in Microsoft Navision allow the user to retrieve the information needed
to prepare the financial statement.
Microsoft Navision cannot check, for
example, if fair value is recorded for specific assets, or if the correct
aggregation levels are used. The setup allows the user to control the
bookkeeping to a wide extent and also, for example, allows the user make
distinctions between current and non-current assets in the balance sheet.
IAS 2 Inventories
Summary of IAS 2
The objective of IAS 2 is to prescribe the
accounting treatment for inventories under the historical cost system. It
provides guidance on the determination of the cost of inventories and
subsequent recognition as an expense, including any write-down to net
realisable value. It also provides guidance on the cost formulas that are used
to assign costs to inventories.
Inventories include assets held for sale in
the ordinary course of business (finished goods), assets in the production
process for sale in the ordinary course of business (work in process), and
materials and supplies that are consumed in production (raw materials).
However, IAS 2 excludes certain inventories
from its scope:
·
work in progress arising under
construction contracts (see IAS 11, Construction Contracts
·
financial instruments (see IAS
39, Financial Instruments)
·
producers’ inventories of
livestock, agricultural assets, forest products, and mineral ores to the extent
that they are measured at net realisable value (whether above or below cost) in
accordance with established industry practices
Fundamental Principle of IAS 2
Inventories are required to be stated at
the lower of cost and net realisable value (NRV).
Net
realisable value is selling price less cost to complete the inventory and sell
it. Cost includes all costs to bring the inventories to their present condition
and location. If specific cost is not determinable, the benchmark treatment is
to use either the first in, first out (FIFO) or weighted average cost formulas.
The cost of
inventory is recognised as an expense in the period in which the related
revenue is recognised.
If
inventory is written down to net realisable value, the write-down is charged to
expense. Any reversal of such a write-down in a later period is credited to
income by reducing that period’s cost of goods sold.
Required
disclosures include:
·
Accounting policy,
·
Carrying amount of inventories by category,
·
Carrying amount of inventory carried at net realisable value,
·
Amount of any reversal of a write-down,
·
Carrying amount of inventory pledged as security for liabilities, and
·
Cost of inventory charged to expense for the period.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 2
Microsoft Navision allows both FIFO and
weighted average for inventory valuation. For inventory revaluations the cost
prices for each item can be changed and the inventory adjustments can be
calculated in batch jobs controlled by the user.
Cost of inventory expensed in a period can be
posted manually through Inventory Journals.
In Microsoft Navision cost of goods sold
are recognised when the inventory items are sold, i.e. when the corresponding
revenue is recognised. Advanced Dimensions can be used when recording inventory
transactions.
IAS 7 Cash Flow Statement
IAS 7 prescribes how to present information
about the historical changes in cash and cash equivalents of an enterprise by
means of a cash flow statement which classifies cash flows during the period
according to operating, investing and financing activities.
The cash flow statement explains changes in
cash and cash equivalents during a period. The cash flow statement should
classify changes in cash and cash equivalents as operating, investing, and
financial activities.
·
Cash equivalents are
short-term, highly liquid investments subject to insignificant risk of changes
in value.
·
Operating activities: May be
presented using either the direct or indirect methods. Direct method shows
receipts from customers and payments to suppliers, employees, government
(taxes), etc. Indirect method begins with accrual basis net profit or loss and
adjusts for major non-cash items.
·
Investing activities: Disclose
separately cash receipts and payments arising from acquisition or sale of property,
plant, and equipment; acquisition or sale of equity or debt instruments of
other enterprises (including acquisition or sale of subsidiaries); and advances
and loans made to, or repayments from, third parties.
·
Financing activities: Disclose
separately cash receipts and payments arising from an issue of share or other
equity securities; payments made to redeem such securities; proceeds arising
from issuing debentures, loans, notes; and repayments of such securities.
Cash flows from taxes should be disclosed
separately within operating activities, unless they can be specifically
identified with one of the other two headings.
Investing and financing activities that do
not give rise to cash flows (a non-monetary transaction such as acquisition of
property by issuing debt) should be excluded from the cash flow statement but
disclosed separately.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 7
Creating a cash flow statement for
disclosure can be prepared using the different reports in Microsoft Navision.
Users can use the report designer to create customized reports for this purpose
or else retrieve the relevant data by running the predefined reports.
IAS 8 Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors
IAS 8 specifies how profit or loss from ordinary
activities and extraordinary items must be presented in the income statement.
IAS 8 also specifies how errors and changes in accounting policy and changes in
estimates must be accounted for.
Errors are defined as newly discovered
omissions or misstatements of prior period financial statements based on
information that was available when the prior financial statements were
prepared.
All material errors will be accounted for
retrospectively by restating all prior periods presented and adjusting the opening
balance of retained earnings of the earliest prior period presented. Cumulative
effect recognition in income will be prohibited.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 8
This IAS does not directly relate to the transactions
recorded in Microsoft Navision. Microsoft Navision users can make corrections
in the open accounting periods through General Journal entries. For errors
related to closed accounting years the documentation of errors must be reported
through reports and filed appropriately.
IAS 10 Events after the Balance
Sheet Date
This is primarily a matter of disclosing
the economic effects of events occurring after the balance sheet date. If the
events are recorded as transactions in Microsoft Navision these may be
retrieved for reporting/disclosure.
When the Balance Sheet and Income statement
are prepared in Microsoft Navision the user can only create entries in the
current year if the year hasn’t been closed. Events after the balance sheet
date that are experienced after the closing of the accounting year have to be
created as manual corrections to the balance sheet retrieved from Microsoft
Navision.
Normally the events are disclosed as
corrections to the financial statements (included in it) or disclosed in notes
to the financial statements.
IAS 11 Construction contracts
IAS 11 prescribes the treatment of revenue
and costs associated with construction contracts.
The principles are:
·
If the total revenue, past and
future costs, and the stage of completion of a contract can be measured or
estimated reliably, revenues and costs should be recognised by stage of
completion (the "percentage-of-completion method").
·
Expected losses should be
recognised immediately.
·
If the outcome cannot be
measured reliably, costs should be expensed, and revenues should be recognised
to the extent that costs are recoverable ("cost recovery method").
·
Disclosure requirements include
(for each major contract or class of contracts):
o Amount of contract revenue recognised.
o Method for determining that revenue.
o Method for determining stage of completion.
o For contracts in progress, disclose aggregate costs incurred,
recognised profits or losses, advances received, and retentions.
o Gross amount due from customers under the contract(s).
o Gross amount owed to customers under the contract(s).
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 11
In Microsoft Navision
construction contracts can be handled using functionality in the Microsoft
Navision Jobs module. Jobs can be used to keep track of construction contracts
and separate revenue and costs. However the user must manually assess the
revenues to be recognised based on the accumulated cost and expected completion
rate of the contracts.
IAS 12 Income Tax
In Fixed Assets, the user can set up multiple
depreciation books for a given asset, including one for tax purposes, which
will allow reporting for that purpose subsequently.
IAS 14 Segment Reporting
Summary of IAS 14
Listed companies must report information
along product and service lines and along geographical lines.
Companies which have more than one business
segment and more than one geographical segment must determine which is primary
and which is secondary. This is based on how the company is managed. The
segment reporting for each individual company must be the same as that for the
consolidated group.
The following should be disclosed for each
primary segment:
·
revenue (external and
inter-segment shown separately)
·
operating result (before
interest and taxes)
·
carrying amount of segment
assets
·
carrying amount of segment
liabilities
·
cost to acquire property,
plant, equipment, and intangibles
·
depreciation and amortisation
·
non-cash expenses other than
depreciation
·
share of profit or loss of
equity and joint venture investments
·
the basis of inter-segment pricing
The following should be disclosed for each
secondary segment:
·
revenue (external and
inter-segment shown separately)
·
carrying amount of segment
assets
·
cost to acquire property,
plant, equipment, and intangibles
·
the basis of inter-segment
pricing
IAS 14 prescribes the segment definition:
Segments are organisational units for which
information is reported to the board of directors and CEO unless those
organisational units are not along product/service or geographical lines, in
which case the next lower level of internal segmentation that reports product
and geographical information must be used.
The segments must also meet the following
criteria:
·
Segments must not be
constructed solely for external reporting purposes.
·
10% materiality thresholds (as
a ratio to revenue, assets or net income).
·
Reportable segments must equal
at least 75% of consolidated revenue.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 14
Microsoft Navision offers a very flexible
segment reporting functionality through Advanced Dimensions. Advanced
Dimensions let the user define an unlimited number of dimensions that can be
used for assigning each transaction to a given dimension, e.g. product line,
area code, sales division etc.
The dimensions used for registering
transactions can later be used for generating segment reporting.
Microsoft Navision lets the user define an
unlimited number of dimensions and dimension values.
Using Advanced Dimensions systematically
will allow definition of segments on:
·
Revenue and costs (including capital
expenditures as a separate item)
·
Primary and Secondary segment
(e.g. product group and geographical region)
·
Assets and liabilities
(categories)
IAS 16 Property, Plant and
Equipment
Summary of IAS 16
IAS
prescribes the treatment of initial recognition and subsequent measurement of
property, plant and equipment.
Property,
plant, and equipment should be recognised when (a) it is probable that future
benefits will flow from it, and (b) its cost can be measured reliably.
Initial
measurement should be at cost. Subsequently, the benchmark treatment is
to use depreciated (amortised) cost but the allowed alternative is to use an
up-to-date fair value.
Main
principles
Depreciation:
·
Long-lived assets other than land are depreciated on a systematic basis
over their useful lives.
·
Depreciation base is cost less estimated residual value.
·
The depreciation method should reflect the pattern in which the asset's
economic benefits are consumed by the enterprise.
·
If assets are re-valued, depreciation is based on the re-valued amount.
·
The useful life should be reviewed periodically and any change should be
reflected in the current period and prospectively.
·
Significant costs to be incurred at the end of an asset's useful life
should either be reflected by reducing the estimated residual value or by
charging the amount as an expense over the life of the asset.
·
If the asset consists of components with different useful lives the
components should be depreciated separately
Revaluations (allowed alternative):
·
Revaluations should be made with sufficient regularity such that the
carrying amount does not differ materially from that which would be determined
using fair value at the balance sheet date.
·
If an item of PP&E has been re-valued, the entire class to which the
asset belongs must be re-valued (for example, all buildings, all land, and all
equipment).
·
Revaluations should be credited to equity (revaluation surplus) unless
reversing a previous charge to income.
·
Decreases in valuation should be charged to income unless reversing a
previous credit to equity (revaluation surplus).
·
If the re-valued asset is sold or otherwise disposed of, any remaining
revaluation surplus either remains as a separate component of equity or is
transferred directly to retained earnings (not through the income statement).
If an
asset's recoverable amount falls below its carrying amount, the decline should
be recognised and charged to income (unless it reverses a previous credit to
equity).
Gains or
losses on retirement or disposal of an asset should be calculated by reference
to the carrying amount.
Required
disclosures include:
·
Reconciliation of movements.
·
Capital commitments
·
Items pledged as security.
·
If assets are re-valued, disclose historical cost amounts.
·
Change in re-valuation surplus.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 16
The Microsoft Navision Fixed Assets module
lets the user record all asset transactions for a given asset. Standard
treatment is cost less accumulated depreciation.
Re-valuations can be manually registered
through Fixed Asset Journals. The re-valuation amount will be recorded as
additions to the given asset. The depreciation period will be the rest of the
main assets life span.
Fixed Assets allows the user to set up the
depreciation scheme to be used for each individual asset. If the depreciation
period is changed the depreciation batch job will include an adjustment to the
current period’s depreciation amount to reflect that change.
The treatment of gains/losses when selling
an asset is controlled by the user through posting to the correct G/L accounts
when creating either a Sales Invoice (if asset is sold) or Fixed Asset Journal
lines (if disposed of without sale)
IAS 17 Leases
Two classes of leases are considered: A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers
substantially all the risks and rewards incident to ownership. All other leases
are classified as operating leases.
For operating leases the
lease payments should be recognised as an expense in the income statement over
the lease term on a straight-line basis, unless another systematic basis is
more representative of the time pattern of the user's benefit.
Financial Leases
Accounting for Lessee
·
Lessee should capitalise a
finance lease at the lower of the fair value and the present value of the
minimum lease payments.
·
Rental payments should be split
into (i) a reduction of liability, and (ii) a finance charge designed to reduce
in line with the liability.
·
Lessee should calculate
depreciation on leased assets using useful life, unless there is no reasonable
certainty of eventual ownership. In the latter case, the shorter of useful life
and lease term should be used.
·
Lessee must include disclosure
of rental expenses, sublease rentals, and a description of leasing arrangements.
·
Lessee should expense operating
lease payments.
Accounting for Lessor
·
For lessors, finance leases
should be recorded as receivables. Lease income should be recognised on the
basis of a constant periodic rate of return.
·
Lessors must disclosure information
about future minimum rentals and amounts of contingent rentals included in net
profit or loss.
·
Lessor should use the net
investment method to allocate finance income. The net cash investment method is
no longer permitted.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 17
In case Lessee wants to register the lease
the Fixed Assets module may be used to a large extent to register finance lease
transactions, allowing registration of the asset acquisition cost and
corresponding depreciation.
IAS 18 Revenue
Summary of IAS 18
The
objective of IAS 18 is to prescribe the accounting treatment for revenue
arising from certain types of transactions and events.
Key Definition
Revenue: The gross inflow of economic benefits (cash,
receivables, other assets) arising from the ordinary operating activities of an
enterprise (such as sales of goods, sales of services, interest, royalties, and
dividends).
Measurement of Revenue
Revenue
should be measured at the fair value of the consideration receivable. An
exchange for goods or services of a similar nature and value is not regarded as
a transaction that generates revenue. However, exchanges for dissimilar items
are regarded as generating revenue.
If the
inflow of cash or cash equivalents is deferred, the fair value of the
consideration receivable is less than the nominal amount of cash and cash
equivalents to be received, and discounting is appropriate. This would occur,
for instance, if the seller is providing interest-free credit to the buyer or
is charging a below-market rate of interest. Interest must be imputed based on
market rates.
IAS 18 prescribes the following disclosure
·
Accounting policy for recognising revenue
·
Amount of each of the following types of revenue:
o
sale of goods
o
rendering of services
o
interest
o
royalties
o
dividends
·
Within each of the above categories, the amount of revenue from exchanges
of goods or services
IAS 18 deals with recognition of revenue
from certain transactions, and as such does not describe specific features. Microsoft
Navision W1 allows the user to set up the system so that recognition of revenue
is in accordance with IAS.
It is important for the compliance with IAS
18 that the criteria for revenue recognition for each category of revenue be
met. IAS 18 defines the criteria for revenue recognition for sales of goods,
rendering of services, interests, royalties & dividends.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 18
Revenue recognition in Microsoft Navision
is done when invoicing (Posting Date) and the Cost of Goods sold is correspondingly
expensed. The Chart of Accounts must be set up so the different types of
revenue can be segregated.
IAS 19 Employee Benefits
The objective of IAS 19 is to prescribe the
accounting for and disclosure of employee benefits (e.g. all forms of
compensation given by an enterprise in exchange for service rendered by
employees). The principle underlying all of the detailed requirements of the
Standard is that the cost of providing employee benefits should be recognised
in the period in which the benefit is earned by the employee, rather than when
it is paid or payable.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 19
Microsoft Navision can import transaction
data, e.g. payroll systems data, from third party products designed specifically
for these purposes.
IAS 20 Accounting for Government
Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance
The objective of IAS 20 is to prescribe the
accounting for, and disclosure of, government grants and other forms of
government assistance.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 20
Fixed Assets may be used to register the
grant amount and the involved economic transactions related to that grant,
including repayment amounts.
IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in
Foreign Exchange Rates
Summary of IAS 21
IAS 21 prescribes the treatment of an
entity’s foreign currency transactions and foreign operations. IAS 39
prescribes the criteria for selecting the functional currency (not described in
this document). Functional currency must
be determined for each entity in a group.
Foreign currency transactions.
Transactions in currencies other than the
functional currency should be translated on the date of the transaction. In
practice the exchange rates applied are adjusted periodically, e.g. weekly or
monthly. Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the rates at the
balance sheet date.
Accounting for foreign entities.
Following the improvements proposal, the
“foreign entities integral to the operations of the parent” will be eliminated
as these entities will have the same functional currency as the parent. Thus
only self-sustaining foreign entities are translated.
Investments in self-sustaining foreign
entities
Transactions in currencies other than the
functional currency should be translated on the date of the transaction.
Monetary assets and liabilities should be translated at closing rates and
income statement items are translated at transaction rates (or, in practice,
average rates). Differences should be taken directly to equity.
Disclosures:
·
translation differences
included in net income
·
analysis of translation
differences in equity
·
changes in rates after balance
sheet date
·
foreign exchange risk
management policies
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 21[5]
Microsoft Navision can handle transactions
denominated in any currency. Using the Currency Exchange Rate table the
transactions will be recorded at the currency rate as of the transaction dates
(Posting Dates) if rates are adjusted on a daily basis.
Through a batch job Microsoft Navision can
adjust all open A/P and A/R entries denominated in foreign currencies and
convert these so they reflect the currency exchange rate at the balance sheet
date. Any adjustments are posted to a G/L account specified by the user.
IAS 22 Business Combinations
This IAS describes the criteria for
treatment of the combined assets of two entities when consolidating into one
new entity. The Standard covers both an
acquisition of one enterprise by another (an acquisition) and also the rare
situation where an acquirer cannot be identified (a uniting of interests).
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 22
In Microsoft Navision, using Advanced
Dimensions functionality, the entries related to each business can be separated
for later analysis and reporting purposes. Goodwill and amortisation of
goodwill can be handled in the Fixed Assets module, including the dimensions
treatment.
IAS 23 Borrowing Costs
Summary of IAS 23
The benchmark treatment is to treat
borrowing costs as expenses. The allowed alternative is to capitalise those
directly attributable to construction.
If capitalised funds are specifically
borrowed, the borrowing costs should be calculated after any investment income
on temporary investment of the borrowings. If funds are borrowed generally,
then a capitalisation rate should be used based on the weighted average of
borrowing costs for general borrowings outstanding during the period. Borrowing
costs capitalised should not exceed those actually incurred.
Capitalisation begins when expenditures and
borrowing costs are being incurred and construction of the asset is in
progress. Capitalisation is suspended if construction is suspended for an
extended period, and ends when substantially all activities are complete.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 23
The Microsoft Navision user can record
borrowing transactions manually through General Journals. Combined with proper
setup of the chart of account the borrowing costs can be reported separately
and to the detail level needed.
IAS 24 Related Party DisclosureS
IAS 24 describes the required disclosure of
transactions with related parties
Related parties are those able to control
or exercise significant influence. Such relationships include:
·
Parent-subsidiary relationships
(see IAS 27: Consolidated Financial Statements).
·
Entities under common control.
·
Associates (see IAS 28:
Investments in Associates).
·
Individuals who, through
ownership, have significant influence over the enterprise and close members of
their families.
·
Key management personnel.
Disclosures include:
·
Nature of relationships where
control exists, even if there were no transactions between the related parties.
·
Nature and amount of
transactions with related parties, grouped as appropriate.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 24
To set up dimensions to be used to register
such transactions for reporting purposes the user can use Advanced Dimensions.
IAS 26 Accounting and Reporting for
Defined Benefit Plans
IAS 26 describes the criteria used for
measurement and disclosure of retirement benefits plans.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 24
As for employee benefits, IAS 19, the usual
practice is to import data from payroll systems.
IAS 27 Consolidated Financial
Statements
IAS 27 defines the concept of a subsidiary
as “a company controlled by another enterprise (the parent).”
If a parent has one or more subsidiaries,
consolidated financial statements are required[6]
IAS 27 has the following criteria for the
consolidated financial statement:
·
All subsidiaries must be
included, unless control is temporary or if there are severe long-term
restrictions on the transfer of funds from the subsidiary to the parent.
·
The difference between
reporting dates of consolidated subsidiaries should be no more than three
months from the parent’s.
·
Uniform accounting policies
should be followed for the parent and its subsidiaries or, if this is not
practicable, the enterprise must disclose that fact and the proportion of items
in the consolidated financial statements to which different policies have been
applied.
·
In the parent’s separate
financial statements, subsidiaries may be shown at cost, at re-valued amounts
(fair value).
Required disclosures include:
·
Name, country, ownership, and
voting percentages for each significant subsidiary.
·
Reason for not consolidating a
subsidiary.
·
Nature of relationship if
parent does not own more than 50% of the voting power of a consolidated
subsidiary.
·
Nature of relationship if the
parent does own more than 50% of the voting power of a subsidiary excluded from
consolidation.
·
The effect of acquisitions and
disposals of subsidiaries during the period.
In the parent’s separate financial statements, the method used to account for subsidiaries must be described.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 27
Microsoft Navision has a consolidation
feature that allows consolidation. Microsoft Navision cannot check if the
criteria in IAS are met, as this must be assessed beforehand. The consolidation
feature also includes different translation methods allowing compliance with
IAS 21 (see above).
Intra-group balances and transactions and
resulting unrealised profits must be eliminated in the consolidated financial
statements. Currently Microsoft Navision has no functionality to automatically
eliminate Intercompany revenue and/or balances, which therefore must be done
manually by posting general journal lines in the consolidating company’s
General Ledger.
Microsoft Navision provides reports for per-company (Business Unit) reports of the trial balance in the consolidating company.
Microsoft Navision provides reports for per-company (Business Unit) reports of the trial balance in the consolidating company.
IAS 28 Accounting for Investments
in Associates
IAS 28 prescribes the accounting treatment
to be adopted by an investor for investments in associates.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 28
To support accounting for investments in
associates, the user can use Advanced Dimensions to separate costs and revenue
related to associate investments.
IAS 29 Financial Reporting in
Hyperinflationary Economies
IAS 29 establishes standards for
enterprises reporting in the currency of a hyperinflationary economy, so that
the financial information provided is meaningful.
Hyperinflation is indicated if cumulative
inflation over three years is 100 per cent or more (among other factors). In
such a circumstance, financial statements should be presented in a measuring
unit that is current at the balance sheet date. Comparative amounts for prior
periods are also restated in the measuring unit at the current balance sheet
date.
Any gain or loss on the net monetary
position arising from the restatement of amounts in the measuring unit current
at the balance sheet date should be included in net income and separately
disclosed.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 29
Reporting of financial statements in
hyperinflationary economies is not supported with specific Microsoft Navision
functionality. When consolidating financial statements from subsidiaries in
hyperinflationary economies, SIC 30 prescribes the use of closing rate at the
balance sheet date. This can be done in Microsoft Navision, but the actual
restatement of such a financial statement must be done manually or through
customized batch jobs.
IAS 30 Disclosures in Financial
Statements of Banks and Similar Institutions
IAS 30 describes the classification of
income and balance sheet items to be used for banks and similar institutions
when preparing the financial statement. Microsoft Navision has no specific
functionality to support the disclosure requirements for Banks.
IAS 31 Financial Reporting of
Interests in Joint Ventures
The objective of IAS 31 is to prescribe the
accounting treatment required for interests in joint ventures, irrespective of
the structures or forms under which the joint venture activities take place.
For the purposes of the Standard, joint ventures are classified as jointly
controlled operations, jointly controlled assets and jointly controlled
entities.
Joint venture: A contractual arrangement by
which two or more parties (venturers) undertake an economic activity that is
subject to joint control.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 31
As with construction contracts, the
accounting for joint ventures can be supported by using functionality in the
Jobs module. Jobs can be used to separate revenue and costs associated with
specific joint ventures.
IAS 32 Financial Instruments -
Disclosure and Presentation
The objective of IAS 32 is to enhance
users' understanding of the significance of on-balance sheet and off-balance
sheet financial instruments to an enterprise's financial position, performance,
and cash flows.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 32
IAS 32 deals with the classification of
financial instruments and does not as such relate to specific functionality in
accounting systems. The required disclosure items specified under IAS 32 will
primarily be provided by sources outside the Microsoft Navision system, e.g.
recognition methods, interest rate risk exposure, etc.
IAS 33 Earnings per Share
IAS 33 describes the measurement and
disclosure of earnings per share and is not supported by any specific Microsoft
Navision functionality. However, for the calculations the users will need to
retrieve data from Microsoft Navision, which can be done using the predefined
reports or customized reports.
IAS 33 applies only to publicly listed
companies. IAS 33 deals with disclosure of information that does not directly
relate to the information in Microsoft Navision. Most likely the only
information relevant to retrieve from Microsoft Navision will be the amounts
posted to “Shareholder’s Equity”, “Paid-in Capital” and other equity accounts.
IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting
IAS 34 prescribes the same requirements for
the interim reports as for the annual report, so interim reporting must also
comply with all the IAS'.
Interim statements are often needed to meet
the requirements of IAS and US GAAP. These comparisons are of interest to
shareholders and analysts.
IAS 35 Discontinuing Operations
IAS 35 establishes principles for reporting
information about discontinuing activities (see definition below), thereby
enhancing the ability of users of financial statements to make projections of
an enterprise's cash flows, earnings-generating capacity and financial
position, by segregating information about discontinuing activities from
information about continuing operations. In particular, IAS 35 provides
guidance on how to apply IAS 36, Impairment of Assets, and IAS 37, Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, to a discontinuing operation.
Discontinuing Operation: a relatively large component of a
business enterprise that the enterprise either is disposing of substantially in
its entirety or is terminating through abandonment or piecemeal sale.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 35
Advanced Dimensions combined with segment
reporting will allow separate reporting for the discontinued operations.
IAS 36 Impairment of Assets
Summary of IAS 36
IAS 36 addresses mainly accounting for
impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
The Standard includes requirements for identifying an impaired asset, measuring
its recoverable amount, recognising or reversing any resulting impairment loss,
and disclosing information on impairment losses or reversals of impairment
losses.
IAS 36 prescribes how an enterprise should
ensure that its assets are not overstated in the financial statements, how an
enterprise should assess the amount to be recovered from an asset (the
"recoverable amount"), and when an enterprise should account for an
impairment loss identified by this assessment.
Main requirement of IAS 36: An impairment
loss should be recognised whenever the recoverable amount of an asset is less
than its carrying amount (sometimes called "book value");
Other requirements of IAS 36 are:
The recoverable amount of an asset is the
higher of its net selling price and its value in use, both based on present
value calculations;
Net selling price is the amount obtainable
from the sale of an asset in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable
willing parties, less the costs of disposal;
Value in use is the amount obtainable from
the use of an asset until the end of its useful life and from its subsequent
disposal. Value in use is calculated as the present value of estimated future
cash flows. The discount rate should be a pre-tax rate that reflects current
market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the
asset;
Recording impairment:
·
An impairment loss should be
recognised as an expense in the income statement for assets carried at cost and
treated as a revaluation decrease for assets carried at re-valued amount.
·
An impairment loss should be
reversed (and income recognised) when there has been a change in the estimates
used to determine an assets recoverable amount since the last impairment loss
was recognised.
·
A reversal of an impairment
loss should be recognised as income in the income statement for assets carried
at cost and treated as a revaluation increase for assets carried at re-valued
amount;
When impairment losses are recognised or
reversed an enterprise should disclose certain information by class of assets
and by reportable segments. Further disclosure is required if impairment losses
recognised or reversed are material to the financial statements of the
reporting enterprise as a whole.
The recoverable amount of an asset should
be estimated whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.
IAS 36 includes a list of indicators of impairment to be considered at each
balance sheet date.
Single
asset or cash-generating unit
If an asset does not generate cash inflows
that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets, an
enterprise should determine the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit
to which the asset belongs. A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable
group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the
cash inflows from other assets or group of assets. Principles for recognising
and reversing impairment losses for a cash-generating unit are the same as
those for an individual asset. The concept of cash-generating units will often
be used in testing assets for impairment because, in many cases, assets work
together rather than in isolation
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 36
Fixed Assets lets the user record the
initial recognition of an asset at cost. Subsequent re-valuations must be
carried out manually, as the Fixed Assets module cannot provide guidance to net
selling price nor value in use.
Under IAS the depreciation schemes in Fixed
Assets can still be used. Any adjustments resulting from an impairment being
recorded for a given asset will result in adjustment entries to the subsequent
depreciation for that asset. Impairments are thus recorded as negative additions
to the original asset. Depending on whether the asset is carried at cost or
re-valued amount, the impairment amount must be recorded as an expense or as a
deduction from equity or both.
IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets
IAS 37 primarily deals with assessments,
the focus being on the recognition of obligations, defined as obligations as a
result of past events. These assessments, e.g. recognition criteria, measurement
methods, etc. cannot be done automatically. Hence, the accounting systems can
only offer indirect support for IAS 37.
IAS 38 Intangible Assets
Summary of IAS 38
IAS 38
applies to all intangible assets that are not specifically dealt with in other
International Accounting Standards. It applies, among other things, to
expenditures on:
·
advertising,
·
training,
·
start-up, and
·
Research and development (R&D) activities.
IAS 38 does
not apply to financial assets, insurance contracts, mineral rights and the
exploration for and extraction of minerals and similar non-regenerative
resources.
IAS 38 requires an enterprise to recognise
an intangible asset if, and only if, certain criteria are met. The Standard
also specifies how to measure the carrying amount of intangible assets and
requires certain disclosures regarding intangible assets.
An
intangible asset should be recognised initially, at cost, in the financial
statements, if, and only if:
·
The asset meets the definition of an intangible asset. Particularly, there
should be an identifiable asset that is controlled and clearly distinguishable
from an enterprise's goodwill;
·
It is probable that the future economic benefits that are attributable to
the asset will flow to the enterprise; and
·
The cost of the asset can be measured reliably.
IAS 38
includes additional recognition criteria for internally generated intangible
assets[7]:
It follows
from the recognition criteria that all expenditure on research should be
recognised as an expense. The same treatment applies to start-up costs,
training costs and advertising costs. IAS 38 also specifically prohibits the
recognition of assets as internally generated goodwill, brands, mastheads,
publishing titles, customer lists and items similar in substance. However, some
development expenditure may result in the recognition of an intangible asset
(for example, some internally developed computer
software).
After
initial recognition in the financial statements, an intangible asset should be
measured according to one of the following two treatments:
·
Benchmark treatment: historical cost less any amortisation and impairment losses; or
·
Allowed alternative treatment: re-valued amount (based on fair value) less any subsequent amortisation
and impairment losses.
Intangible
assets should be amortised over the best estimate of their useful life. IAS 38
does not permit an enterprise to assign an infinite useful life to an
intangible asset. It includes a rebuttable presumption that the useful life of
an intangible asset will not exceed 20 years from the date when the asset is
available for use.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 38
Fixed Assets in Microsoft Navision allows
the user to register transactions for intangible assets and record subsequent
amortizations/re-valuations.
Microsoft Navision cannot check if an asset
is tangible or intangible, thus setting the depreciation period, recording
re-valuations, and specifying classification must be done manually. The Jobs
module can be used to keep track of intangible assets.
IAS 39 Financial Instruments -
Recognition and Measurement
IAS 39 is especially important for banks
and financial institutions since it deals with financial risk management,
hedging, investments and financing policies, but also for non-financial
companies the impact may be significant, particularly with regard to hedge
accounting.
Summary of IAS 39
IAS 39 will have a significant impact on
listed companies, because it requires these companies to recognise and measure
all financial hedging instruments to fair value (market price). So, in most
cases a formal treasury management system is needed. IAS 39 requires all hedges
to be documented and continually evaluated for effectiveness.
Under IAS 39, all financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the balance sheet, including all derivatives. They are initially measured at cost, which is the fair value of consideration paid or received to acquire the financial asset or liability.
An
enterprise should recognise normal purchases and sales of financial assets in
the market place either at trade date or settlement date. Certain value changes
between trade and settlement dates are recognised for purchases if settlement
date accounting is used.
Assets are
categorized as follows:
·
Originated loans and receivables. These are loans and receivables
originated by an enterprise and not held for trading. The enterprise need not
demonstrate intent to hold originated loans and receivables to maturity.
·
Held-to-maturity investments: Fixed maturity investments, e.g.
debt securities and mandatorily redeemable preferred shares that an enterprise
intends and is able to hold to maturity. The classification depends on
management intent.[8]
·
Financial assets held for trading: Financial assets acquired for the
purpose of generating a profit from short-term fluctuations in price. Derivative
assets are always deemed held for trading unless used as hedging instruments.
·
Available-for-sale financial assets: All financial assets not in one of
the above three categories.
After
acquisition Originated loans and receivables and Held-to-maturity investments are
measured at original recorded amount less principal repayments and
amortisation. Financial assets held for trading and Available-for-sale
financial assets will be measured at fair value.
Hedging
Hedging,
for accounting purposes, means designating a derivative or (only for hedges of
foreign currency risks) a non-derivative financial instrument as an offset in
net profit or loss, in whole or in part, to the change in fair value or cash
flows of a hedged item. Hedge accounting is permitted under IAS 39 in certain
circumstances, provided that the hedging relationship is clearly defined,
measurable, and actually effective.
Hedge
accounting is permitted only if an enterprise designates a specific hedging
instrument as a hedge of a change in value or cash flow of a specific hedged
item, rather than as a hedge of an overall net balance sheet position. However,
the approximate income statement effect of hedge accounting for an overall net
position can be achieved, in some cases, by designating part of one of the
underlying items as the hedged position.
For hedges
of forecasted transactions that result in the recognition of a non-financial
asset or liability, the gain or loss on the hedging instrument will adjust the
basis (carrying amount) of the acquired asset or liability.
On initial
adoption of IAS 39, adjustments to bring derivatives and other financial assets
and liabilities onto the balance sheet and adjustments to re-measure certain
financial assets and liabilities from cost to fair value will be made by
adjusting retained earnings directly.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 39
Accounting for financial instruments and
hedge accounting in a large number of transactions requires a separate treasury
system from where the G/L transactions can be imported and recorded in Microsoft
Navision. Advanced Dimensions and separate G/L account can provide the basis
for detailed recording of the transactions.
IAS 40 Investment property
Summary of IAS 40
IAS 40
covers investment property held by all enterprises and is not limited to
enterprises whose main activities are in this area.
Investment
property is property (land or a building - or part of a building - or both)
held (by the owner or by the lessee under a finance lease) to earn rentals or
for capital appreciation or both.
Under IAS
40, an enterprise must choose either:
·
Fair value model: investment property should be measured at fair value and changes in fair
value should be recognised in the income statement; or
·
Cost model (the
same as the benchmark treatment in IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment):
investment property should be measured at depreciated cost (less any
accumulated impairment losses). An enterprise that chooses the cost model
should disclose the fair value of its investment property.
An enterprise should apply the model
chosen to all its investment property.
Microsoft Navision functionality related to IAS 40
Microsoft Navision users can record
investment property transactions in the Fixed Assets module, allowing a better
overview of the individual assets. No specific feature supports investment
property revaluation processes (e.g. cost or market value), which must be
carried out manually through Fixed Assets Journals.
IAS 41 Agriculture
IAS 41 describes how accounting for
biological assets should be done. Biological assets are livestock, crops, etc.
that are transformed into produce. The recognition, which is primarily when the
enterprise gains control of the asset, and measurement, which is fair value
less estimated point-of-sale costs, cannot
be automated, e.g. the accounting systems must be set up to reflect
these criteria; hence, the accounting systems can only offer indirect support
for IAS 37.
[1] Though the new standards are called IFRS the common usage is IAS
standards, which will be used in this document.
[2] See http://europa.eu.int/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=en&numdoc=32002R1606&model=guichett
[5] The forthcoming 4.0 release of Microsoft Navision will include
functionality allowing consolidation of subsidiaries financial statements
according to IAS 21. The consolidation feature will include options to specify
which currency exchange rates to use for each G/L Account.
Microsoft Navision will not be able
to check for correct choice of measurement currency, but allows the user to
consolidate from either the general ledger in the entity’s local currency or
the currency specified as Additional Reporting Currency.
[6] Exception: wholly owned subsidiary of parent who prepares
consolidated FS (see standard for details)]
[7] See full IAS text for details and full list of criteria.
[8] Under IAS 39, if an enterprise actually sells a held-to-maturity
investment other than in a circumstance that could not be anticipated or in
insignificant amounts, all of its other held-to-maturity investments must be
reclassified as available-for-sale for the next and two following financial
reporting years).
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder